PA 07-192—sSB 1258

Environment Committee

Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee


SUMMARY: This act makes several changes to the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Petroleum Clean-Up program. Among other things, it

1. allows certain owners and operators of USTs to store certain records off-site;

2. broadens eligibility for reimbursement from the account;

3. limits the attorney general's ability to sue in certain cases;

4. changes requirements for obtaining payment or reimbursement from the UST Clean-Up Petroleum Account Review Board (board);

5. modifies the requirements for written approvals accompanying reimbursement and payment applications;

6. requires the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) commissioner to adopt certain regulations concerning the removal of residential heating oil storage tank systems; and

7. makes technical and conforming changes.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Various. See below.


The UST Petroleum Clean-up Account reimburses UST owners and operators for remediation costs they incur because of leaking commercial USTs. The account is funded by a portion of the revenue from the petroleum products gross earnings tax. The board decides which claims to reimburse and directs the DEP commissioner to make payments.


Prior law required UST owners and operators to store most UST records on-site (see BACKGROUND). The act allows UST owners and operators with more than 10 UST facilities to store certain records at a central state location as long as they can immediately provide them to DEP for inspection. They must specify, in writing, the central location and any other information the DEP commissioner requires. They must submit the information to DEP on a form DEP prescribes.

But the act requires such owners and operators to keep the following records on-site:

1. a copy of all UST facility notification forms (Form EPHM-6) submitted to the commissioner;

2. the most recent cathodic protection tests for all metallic USTs;

3. the previous six months of inspection records of USTs with impressed current cathodic protection, if applicable;

4. the most recent 12 months of UST repair records required by regulation;

5. the most recent six months of records showing compliance with release detection regulations, including inventory control and reconciliation of inventory control records;

6. records of the two most recent UST tightness tests; and

7. any other UST records the commissioner specifies in writing.

The act states explicitly that these provisions do not affect any water pollution control laws other than those regarding record storage.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2007


The act requires the DEP commissioner to adopt regulations concerning the removal of pipes from residential heating oil storage tank systems when the tank is removed, regardless of the tank's capacity.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2007


The act broadens eligibility for reimbursement from the UST Clean-Up Account for costs incurred because of leaking USTs. Prior law barred the DEP commissioner from reimbursing claims for interest after June 1, 2005. The act authorizes the commissioner to reimburse claims for interest on attorneys' fees filed on or before March 31, 2003 that have been tabled for at least three years.

Prior law also barred the commissioner from reimbursing claims for attorneys' fees or other legal costs of more than (1) $5,000 to a responsible party (see BACKGROUND), and (2) $10,000 to anyone who is not a responsible party. The act allows the commissioner to reimburse larger claims if they were filed on or before June 30, 2005.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage


Under prior law, an applicant seeking payment or reimbursement of more than $250,000 from the clean-up account had to include all necessary written approvals with his application. The approval had to be from the commissioner, or if the commissioner so authorized, a licensed environmental professional (LEP). The act allows an applicant to submit the commissioner's written approval (but not the LEP's) separately. It specifies that the commissioner's written approval for this purpose (1) does not constitute an approval for any other purpose, and (2) must be presented to the board before it decides on the payment or reimbursement application.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage, and applicable to applications filed on or after July 1, 2005.


Under prior law, the account review board had to reimburse or pay certain people from the account if certain conditions were met. To receive payment, a responsible party, among other things, had to have notified the commissioner of a release according to regulation, or as soon as practicable. The act requires that the responsible party notify the board, and not the commissioner, of the release.

Under prior law, if, when a responsible party applied for reimbursement there was no UST dispensing petroleum on the property where the release occurred, he must have shown, among other things, that his failure to comply with the law or regulation was not directly responsible for the leak. The act limits this requirement to cases where an application is made by a UST owner or operator, or someone who owned and operated the UST at the time of the release.

It distinguishes between applications filed before October 1, 2007, and those filed on or after that date. Generally, in either case the owner or operator must show that the release was neither caused by his failure to comply with the law or regulation, or from his reckless, willful, wanton or intentional acts or omissions, and there must not be a UST dispensing petroleum on the property. But the act exempts from this requirement owners and operators who file applications on or after October 1, 2007 who do not have a UST subject to federal financial requirements. Under the act, the requirement that an owner or operator show that failure to comply with the law was not the direct cause of the leak does not apply to an application filed with the board concerning a leak from a UST owned or operated at the time of the leak by a municipality or political subdivision of the state, if the leak was reported to DEP in September 2003 and the UST was removed on or before April 1, 2005.

The act specifies that if the board denied reimbursement or made only partial payment or reimbursement to an applicant in certain cases on or before June 30, 2005, the denial, partial payment, or reimbursement remains in effect and applies to all subsequent applications concerning that release.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage and applicable to applications filed either before or after the act's passage, but the financial responsibility requirement applies only to applications filed on or after October 1, 2007.


By law, the attorney general may sue to recover damages from UST owners and operators or others in certain instances. Under prior law he could sue an owner or operator who failed to notify the commissioner of a UST leak when required to do so. Under the act, he can only sue in those cases where the UST is subject to facility notification form EPHM-6 and the owner or operator knowingly and intentionally fails to submit that form to the commissioner. (By law, unchanged by the act, the attorney general may also sue when the leak results from a reckless, willful, wanton or intentional act or omission and in other cases. )

EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage, and applicable to applications filed with the account before and after passage.


UST Record Keeping

By regulation, owners and operators of UST systems must maintain records of the operation of corrosion protection equipment, system repairs, compliance with release detection requirements, and other information. They also must maintain up-to-date records of significant construction or installation, monitoring, substantial modifications, and other activities.

Federal Underground Storage Tank Program

In 1984, Congress amended Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 USC 6901 et seq. ) requiring the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop regulations to protect human health and the environment from damage caused by USTs. EPA developed regulations designed to prevent leaks and to locate and correct leaking systems. The regulations also require states to develop UST programs at least as strict as EPA's (40 CFR 281. 11). DEP adopted regulations in 1985, which EPA approved in 1988. Federal regulations require UST owners and operators to keep records (1) on-site and immediately available for inspection or (2) at a readily available alternative site, to be provided for inspection upon request (40 CFR 280. 34).

Responsible Party

The law (CGS 22a-449a (3)) creates two definitions of responsible party, depending on when the board received a claim for payment. For claims received before July 1, 2005, a responsible party is anyone who owns or operates a UST from which a release or suspected release takes place.

For claims received after July 1, 2005, a responsible party is anyone who, at any time (1) owns, leases, uses, operates, or has an interest in a UST from which a leak or suspected leak occurred or (2) owns, leases, uses, or has an interest in property where there is a UST. These people are responsible parties regardless of whether they had an interest in the UST or the property when the leak occurred. A responsible party also includes anyone related to someone in the first two groups through a family, contractual, corporate, or financial relationship.

OLR Tracking: PF: GC: JL: RO