OLR Bill Analysis
AN ACT CONCERNING VISITATION RIGHTS FOR GRANDPARENTS AND OTHER PERSONS.
Current law allows grandparents and other third parties to petition for the right to visit a minor; and the court may grant the request, subject to conditions and limitations it deems equitable. This bill instead requires a petitioner to include in his or her request, specific and good-faith allegations that (1) a parent-like relationship with the minor exists and (2) the minor will suffer real and substantial harm if the visitation is denied. (This means a degree of harm analogous to a claim that the minor is neglected or uncared-for as defined under state child abuse statutes. ) Unlike most petitions, the petitioner must swear that its allegations are true (“verify”).
The court must hold a hearing and grant the request if it finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that these conditions have been met. Establishing the “clear and convincing evidence” standard complies with the standard stated in a recent Connecticut Supreme Court decision (see BACKGROUND).
The bill also:
1. establishes factors the court may consider when determining whether a parent-like relationship exists between the petitioner and the minor;
2. specifies visitation terms and conditions the court may set;
3. specifies that any visitation rights granted to a third party do not prevent a custodial parent from relocating; and
4. allows the court to order one party to pay the other's fees, including those charged by the minor's attorney, guardian ad litem, or expert based on the individual's ability to pay.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2012
PARENT-LIKE RELATIONSHIP DETERMINATIONS
Under the bill, when determining the existence of a parent-like relationship between the petitioner and minor, the court may consider:
1. the existence and length of the person's and minor's relationship before the court petition was filed,
2. the length of time that relationship has been disrupted,
3. the specific parent-like activities of the petitioner toward the minor,
4. any evidence that the petitioner has unreasonably undermined the custodial parent's authority and discretion,
5. the significant absence of a parent from the minor's life,
6. the death or physical separation of the minor's parents, and
7. the fitness of the petitioner and the custodial parent.
If the petitioner is a grandparent, the court may also consider the history of regular contact and proof of a substantial relationship between the grandparent and minor. The bill defines “grandparent” as a grandparent or great-grandparent related to a minor child by blood, marriage, or adoption.
By law, the court may set the terms and conditions of any visitation it grants, provided they are not contingent on any court order of financial support. The bill specifies that such terms and conditions may include (1) the dates, days, time, and location; (2) whether overnight visits are allowed; and (3) any other conditions it determines are in the minor's best interest. The law requires the court to consider the minor's wishes if he or she is old enough and capable of forming an intelligent opinion.
When determining the visitation terms and conditions, the bill allows the court to consider the effect of (1) the visitation on the minor's relationship with his or her parents or guardians and (2) any domestic violence that has occurred between or among parents, grandparents, petitioners, and the minor.
State Supreme Court Case on Visitation
In Roth v. Weston, a maternal grandmother and aunt petitioned under CGS § 46b-59 for visitation with children whose father had terminated it after the children's mother committed suicide (Roth v. Weston, 259 Conn. 202 (2002)). The relatives claimed that visitation was in the children's best interest, although they did not contend that the father was not a fit parent. In his response, the father presented reasons why he believed visitation was not in the children's best interest.
The trial court granted the petition. But the Connecticut Supreme Court reversed, it ruling that CGS § 46b-59 would be unconstitutional unless it required any third party, including a grandparent or a great-grandparent, seeking visitation to make specific and good-faith allegations that (1) a parent-like relationship exists between the child and the person seeking visitation and (2) denial of the visitation will cause real and significant harm to the child as defined under Connecticut's child abuse statutes.
Once these high jurisdictional hurdles are overcome, the petitioner must prove the allegations by clear and convincing evidence. Only if that enhanced burden of persuasion has been met may the court enter an order of visitation.
Joint Favorable Change of Reference